Legal Opinion

Drake v. High

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1918No. 8438PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Craig County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by Arthur E. Drake against E. C. High and others. From the judgment plaintiff and defendant Nannie M. Neale bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR, O.

This action was commenced on the 20th day of December, 1914, in the district court of Craig county by A. F. Drake against C. E. High, TV. J. High, E. J". Drake, L. TV. Clapp, Nannie M. Neale, C. D. Murdock, E. L. Blasingame, L. Houck, and J. V. Poster, to recover' on a-promissory note and to foreclose a certain-real estate mortgage given to secure the-same.

The petition states in substance: That On the 28th day of June, 1913, one Sai*ah E. High and C. E. High executed their promissory note to E. J. Drake for the sum of $396.19, due two years from date, bearing interest at 10…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. AckermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Anderson v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Trubody v. TrubodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Harris-Lipsitz Co. v. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pepper v. TruittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API