Legal Opinion
Cuillo v. Shupnick
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 23, 1993No. 92 Civ. 2569 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The Defendants, all members of the Board of Directors of the Confreries de la Chaine des Rotisseurs, Ltd. (“La Chaine”) 1 have moved to dismiss the claims of the Plaintiffs, all members and former members of La Chaine, 2 of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and violation of their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim. For the reasons given below, the Defendants’ motion is hereby granted.
Facts
On a motion to dismiss, the facts are alleged by the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Curiano v. SuozziNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Easton v. SundramCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Riddell Sports Inc. v. BrooksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Siotkas v. LabOne, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Dallas v. VosburghDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019