Legal Opinion
Riddell Sports Inc. v. Brooks
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 5, 1995No. 92 Civ. 7851 (PKL)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
The plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Riddell Sports Inc., (“Riddell”) along with the other counterclaim defendants (collectively, “counterdefendants”) moves the Court to dismiss counts VII through XI of defendant and counterclaim plaintiff Frederic H. Brooks’ (“Brooks”), and counterclaim plaintiff Connecticut Economics Corporation’s (“CEC”) (collectively, “eounterplaintiffs”) counterclaims, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 8(a)(2). For the reasons stated below, counterdefendants’ motion is granted in part, and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Brooks…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Curiano v. SuozziNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- American Protein Corporation v. Ab Volvo and Volvo Lastvagnar Ab, as Successors in Interest to Beijerinvest Ab, Beijer Industries, Inc. And Bo LyckeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Mandelblatt v. Devon Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Granite Partners, LP v. Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- O'BRIEN v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Katz v. TravelersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Sigmon v. Parker Chapin Flattau & KlimplDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Mina Investment Holdings Ltd. v. LefkowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.