Legal Opinion
Siotkas v. LabOne, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 6, 2009No. 01-CV-6242 (SMG), 01-CV-6243 (SMG)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
STEVEN M. GOLD, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs bring these related actions alleging that LabOne, Inc., a drug testing laboratory, “falsely accus[ed] countless individuals of substituting their urine specimen.” Siotkas Compl. ¶ 2; Van Heule Compl. ¶ 2. Both plaintiffs were airline employees required to undergo drug testing pursuant to federal statutes and regulations. Their urine specimens were sent to and analyzed by defendant LabOne, which ultimately reported to their employer, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”), that the specimens were “substituted,” or…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lenard v. Design StudioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Ahluwalia v. St. George's University, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- M.V.B. Collision, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Levantino v. New York State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Carrillos v. Incorporated VillageDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.