Legal Opinion

Bland v. City Council of Sumter

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 2, 1943No. 15579PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Associate Justice Baker:

This proceeding was brought by appellant to procure a writ of mandamus to require the City Council of Sumter, under its charter as amended on December 24, 1891, 20 St. at Large, p. 1475, and through its Mayor and Councilmen, to appoint a commissioner for the assessment of damages alleged to have been sustained by the appellant by reason of an alteration of a street in the City of Sumter, South Carolina.

The pertinent section of the charter of the City of Sumter, provides: “That the City Council [of Sumter] shall have power…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Leitzsey v. Columbia Water Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  3. Martin v. SayeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. Paris Mountain Water Co. v. City Council of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  5. Garraux v. City Council of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richards v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. Willimon v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Godwin v. CarriganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Richards v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. QuerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API