Legal Opinion

Martin v. Saye

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 26, 1928No. 12500PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

At its 1923 session, the Legislature passed an Act (33 Stat., 881), providing for the issuance and sale of coupon bonds by York County, not in excess of $2,000,000, for permanent highway improvements in that county, and creating a permanent road commission (hereinafter referred to as the commission) to have charge of the carrying out of the provisions of the Act. Among the highways directed to be hard-surfaced were the following:

“From York through Tirzah, Newport, Ebenezer, Rock Hill, * * * through Fort Mill to the North Carolina…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  5. Louisiana v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County of San Bernardino v. WayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Maine Turnpike Auth.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  3. Henderson v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Kirk v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. Federal Land Bank of Cola. v. GarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API