Grider v. USX Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice:
Although this appeal arrives here on cer-tiorari in a seemingly complicated procedural posture, resolution of a single first-*782impression issue disposes of most of it. That issue requires our interpretation of 12 O.S.1981 § 100, the “savings” statute which allows an additional year to bring a new action after a suit fails for reasons other than upon its merits. Is the one year period counted from the dismissal order of the trial court, as defendants urge, or from the terminal date of a timely appeal, as argued by plaintiff? We resolve the question in favor of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Vicki H. Brown v. Hartshorne Public School District 1, Janie Trueblood Lorraine Hollis Jack Holloway Tommy McCullar Dr. Roy HoneywellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Derryberry v. Kerr-McGee CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Reid v. SpazioSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Bladen v. First Presbyterian Church of SallisawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.