Legal Opinion
Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 2011No. 105,460PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
11 Two issues are presented in this appeal. The first is whether a taxpayer should have been allowed to intervene in a District Court proceeding that was brought to obtain a declaratory judgment stating that certain public expenditures and financing were lawful. A portion of this first issue involves whether a gui tam action may be brought on behalf of a public trust and against its officers. The second is whether this appeal is moot because the parties proceeded to obtain a declaratory judgment in the District Court after Taxpayer was not allowed to intervene. We address the second issue…
2Cases cited116 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hill v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- HUNSUCKER v. FALLINSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.