Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 11, 1937PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This action was commenced in the New York Supreme Court on August 24, 1936, and was thereafter, upon defendant’s application, removed to this court. Subsequent to said removal and on or about February 15, 1937, the plaintiffs served an amended complaint.
The present motion is made by defendants under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss each of the four causes of action set forth in the amended complaint on the ground that each of them fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Defendant also moves under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Cowley v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Old Plantation Corp. v. Maule IndustriesSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Woodard v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Henry V. Vaccaro Construction Co. v. A. J. DePace, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Bee Mach. Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.