Legal Opinion
Bee Mach. Co. v. Freeman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 6, 1942No. 3781PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODBURY, Circuit Justice.
On February 3, 1941, the plaintiff, a Massachusetts corporation, brought an action at law against the defendant, a citizen of Ohio, in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for breach of a contract entered into between them on November 29, 1933. In this action personal service was made on the defendant when he happened to be in Boston. By the terms of the contract in suit, the defendant, as the owner of certain patents, gave to the plaintiff a non-exclusive license to manufacture and sell the patented articles in New England and New York, and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Blumenstock Bros. Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Carroll v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Acha v. BeameCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Tallulah Morgan v. John J. Kerrigan, Boston Home and School Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, Kevin H. White, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- O. W. Weeks v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.