Legal Opinion
Dore v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 3, 2001No. AC 19656PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner) suspending his license to operate a motor vehicle pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227b (b).1 The plaintiff claims that the court *606improperly determined that § 14-227b (j)2 does not limit the type of evidence that a person can present at an implied consent hearing and (2) relied on evidence that was not permitted by § 14-227b (b) in reaching its decision at the hearing. We affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schallenkamp v. DelPonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Tompkins v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Lomen v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- Towbin v. Board of Examiners of PsychologistsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Providence Worcester Rr v. Dept. of E.P., No. 000504990s (Jul. 27, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Ross v. Wilson-Coker, No. Cv 00 0501203s (Aug. 16, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001