Philbrook v. Glodgett
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
In these consolidated appeals we are called upon to construe a provision of the Social Security Act of 1935 (Act), as amended, and to ascertain whether a Vermont welfare regulation impermissibly conflicts with that provision. A three-judge District Court held that it did, 368 F. Supp. 211 (Vt. 1973), and we noted probable jurisdiction in the appeal of appellant Philbrook, Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social Welfare, in No. 73-1820, and postponed consideration of the question of jurisdiction in the appeal of appellant Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, in No.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by427 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
422 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.