Legal Opinion

McMakin v. Schenck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1884No. 11,496PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case the appellants, the defendants below, have assigned as errors the decisions of the circuit court in sustaining demurrers to the second and third paragraphs of their answer.

The complaint of the appellee, Schenck, contained two paragraphs. The first paragraph was a complaint in the ordinary form, to recover the possession of certain real estate,, particularly described, in Switzerland county; and the second paragraph was a complaint to quiet the appellee’s title to the same real estate as against the- appellants. The answer of the appellants was in three paragraphs, of which the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tinkler v. SwaynieIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Cox v. ArnsmannIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Beatty v. BrummettIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Butt v. ButtIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Shade v. CrevistonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Cox v. RatcliffeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Benson v. BuntingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Turpie v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Moorman v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API