Legal Opinion

Tinkler v. Swaynie

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 6657PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Erom the Tippecanoe Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The assignments of error are, that the court below erred in overruling the demurrer of the appellant Tinkler to the amended complaint, and in overruling said appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The appellees sued the appellants upon a complaint, in which were averred substantially the following facts :

That on December 27th, 1866, Nancy Swaynie, the mother of the plaintiffs, was the fee simple owner of certain described real estate situate in Tippecanoe county, Indiana; that on said day, while such owner, said Nancy (her husband, the defendant Thomas Swaynie joining therein), executed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Bunnel v. Taintor's administratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
  3. Wight v. Shelby RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1855
  4. Hess v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  5. Devol v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Rucker v. SteelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Felton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Davis v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Cox v. ArnsmannIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API