Benson v. Bunting
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
In 1892 Margaret Reese and Mary E. Dever, two of the plaintiffs in the action, executed to one William M. Iburg a mortgage upon the real estate described in the complaint herein, to secure the payment of money. In a proceeding to foreclose said mortgage, a decree for the sale of the mortgaged premises was entered on April 13, 1897, and on June 1, 1897, the mortgaged premises were sold to defendant Bunting for the sum of nine hundred and fifty dollars, and on February 1, 1898, the commissioner who made the sale conveyed said premises to the purchaser. In January, 1898, the defendants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wight v. Shelby RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1855
- Butt v. ButtIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Griffin v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1849
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Bradley Co. v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hamilton v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1916
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.