Legal Opinion
McMillan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 12, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1867PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Stephen McMillan, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 et seq. (“Title VII”), as well as violations of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the motion, the responses and replies thereto, the applicable law, the entire record, and for the reasons set forth below, the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barouch v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Boehm v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Rodriguez v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Durant v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Robinson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.