Legal Opinion

In Re Adoption of S.P.T.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 2001PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 H.A.M. and B.T.M. (Appellants) appeal the order of the Lackawanna County orphans’ court granting preliminary objections and dismissing their petition to adopt S.P.T. The orphans’ court concluded that Appellants had faded to obtain the requisite consent for adoption from the child’s guardian, see 23 Pa.C.S. § 2711, and so did not have standing to seek the adoption. We conclude that the orphans’ court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm.

¶ 2 H.A.M. is the biological mother of S.P.T., born in 1988. B.T.M. is H.A.M.’s current husband whom she married in 1994, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. FabinyiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Schwab Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. In Re Adoption of HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily NewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Chester County Children & Youth Services v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Catanzaro, J. v. Pennell, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Schmidt v. Deutsch Larrimore Farnish & Anderson, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Catanzaro, J. v. Pennell, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Kopinetz, M. v. Waste ManagementSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Asset Acceptance, LLC v. Kuhne, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API