Yeaple v. Yeaple
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANDERINO, Justice.
The issue before us is whether an appeal filed in the Superior Court by appellant, Amos Howard Yeaple, a resident of Arizona, was properly quashed by the Superior Court because it was untimely filed. Appellant contends in this Court that his appeal was timely filed and should be reinstated. We agree and therefore remand the matter to the Superior Court for a consideration of the merits of the appellant’s appeal.
Appellee, Margaret S. Yeaple, commenced a divorce action in York County against appellant, a resident of Arizona. Service was effected upon…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Reeves v. Middletown Athletic Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Frazier v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Jara v. Rexworks Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Fischer v. UPMC NorthwestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.