City of Springdale v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robinson, Justice.
The trial court held an ordinance of the City of Springdale pertaining to the keeping of chickens in the corporate limits to be invalid, and the City has appealed.
Section One of Ordinance No. 255 of the City of Springdale provides: “That hereafter no person or persons shall keep or permit to be kept within the City limits of Springdale, Arkansas, any cow or cows, hog or hogs, sheep, goats, horses, poultry or other livestock, which animal or animals shall be housed or permitted to run or graze during the day or night within 150 feet of the dwelling house of any other…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Durfey v. ThalheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Town of Arkadelphia v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Smith v. Western Hide & Fur Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- City of Little Rock v. Reinman-Wolfort Automobile Livery Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rogers Group, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville, Ark.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Phillips v. Town of Oak GroveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Arkansas State Board of Architects v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Hackler v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Hahn v. BrooklynCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.