Legal Opinion

Hackler v. City of Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 27, 1964No. 5-3305PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This suit is an attack by appellants1 on the validity of Ordinance 2421 of the City of Fort Smith, which ordinance reads:

“ORDINANCE NO. 2421
“AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING BLASTING IN ROCK QUARRIES WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF FORT SMITH.
“BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF FORT SMITH:
“SECTION 1. No blasting or use of explosives in quarrying operations in rock quarries located in the city limits of Fort Smith shall be permitted.
“SECTION 2: Violation of this ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Werbe v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. City of Argenta v. KeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rogers Group, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville, Ark.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Phillips v. Town of Oak GroveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Phillips v. Town of Oak GroveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Phillips v. Town of Oak GroveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API