Legal Opinion
Hahn v. Brooklyn
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
Decided February 20, 1958No. 662398PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By J. J. P. CORRIGAN, J.:
Plaintiff, a resident of the City of Brooklyn, has instituted this action to have a declaratory judgment entered determining that a certain Ordinance designated as Ordinance No. 1945-17, passed on July 23, 1945, is unconstitutional and void and of no force and effect.
Ordinance No. 1945-17 reads as follows:
“AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE RAISING, KEEPING, MAINTAINING, OR HARBORING OF PIGEONS, CHICKENS, DUCKS, GEESE, TURKEYS, GUINEA HENS, RABBITS, MICE, PIGS, SHEEP, COWS, HORSES, GOATS, OR ANY BIRDS, FOWL, RODENTS, OR ANIMALS DETRIMENTAL TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Watson v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Olsen v. Nebraska Ex Rel. Western Reference & Bond Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Nourse v. City of RussellvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. YeoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- COLTS RUN CIVIC v. Colts Neck Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998