City of Little Rock v. Reinman-Wolfort Automobile Livery Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from PnlasM Chancery Court; J. E. Marr tineau, Chancellor; 1. The State has the right, under its police power, to prohibit the carrying on of a livery stable business within certain designated limits, and having such power it can delegate it to cities. 22 S. W. 470; 16 Mo. App. 131; 16 Wal. 62; 5 Am. St. Eep. 331; 37 Am. Eep. 564; 41 Am. St. Eep. 630 ;'53 Id. 325; 91 Am. Dec. 472; 83 Id. 740; 90 Id. 278; 34 Id. 637; 33 Pa: St. 202; 18 O. St. 563; 54 Wis. 376.; 90 Am.
Read the full summary
Appeal from PnlasM Chancery Court; J. E. Marr tineau, Chancellor; 1. The State has the right, under its police power, to prohibit the carrying on of a livery stable business within certain designated limits, and having such power it can delegate it to cities. 22 S. W. 470; 16 Mo. App. 131; 16 Wal. 62; 5 Am. St. Eep. 331; 37 Am. Eep. 564; 41 Am. St. Eep. 630 ;'53 Id. 325; 91 Am. Dec. 472; 83 Id. 740; 90 Id. 278; 34 Id. 637; 33 Pa: St. 202; 18 O. St. 563; 54 Wis. 376.; 90 Am. Dec: 279; 90 S: W. 874; 83 Am. Dee. 208; 26 Am. St. Eep. 664. :■ • ■ 2. ' The power to pass'this'ordinance "was…
1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.
This suit challenges the validity of the following ordinance of the city of Little Rock:
Ordinance No. 1729.
AN ORDINANCE TO REGULATE LIVERY STABLES.
“Whereas, the conducting of a livery stable business within certain parts of the city of Little Rock, Arkansas, is detrimental to the health, interest and pros-' perity of the city of Little Rock; therefore “Be it ordained by the city council of the city of Little
Rock:
“Section 1. That it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to conduct or carry on a livery stable business within the following area, to'wit: ■ Beginning at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ozan Lumber Co. v. Union County Nat. Bank of LibertySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Williams v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- City of Rochester v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Cronin v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Van Hovenberg v. HolmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Herring v. StannusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Rogers Group, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville, Ark.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.