Apodaca v. Wilson
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTOYA, Justice.
On August 2, 1971, the Albuquerque City Commission adopted Ordinance 102-1971 which increased sewer and water service charges over those charged under the superseded ordinance. On the same day, the City Commission adopted Budget Resolution No. 2, where by its terms, the City requests approval by the Attorney General and the Department of Finance and Administration for budget transfers and increases enumerated in schedules attached to the resolution. The schedules indicated that water and sewer revenues increased by the amount of $1,505,233, and that from such amount…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Valdez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Albuquerque v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- New Mexicans for Free Enterprise v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Stennis v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- American Civil Liberties Union v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.