Baylor v. Butterfass
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Carver county against Fred Butterfass, defendant, and Julius Pieper, garnishee. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company intervened as claimant of the garnished fund. The issues between plaintiff and claimant were tried before Cadwell, J., who found in favor of claimant. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
After the commencement of this action and the service of the garnishee summons, claimant, Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company, appeared and made claim to the indebtedness due from the garnishee to defendant, and served and filed a complaint setting forth the grounds of its claim. Issue was joined between plaintiff and claimant, the cause was tried, and resulted in judgment for claimant, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying a new trial.
The cause was tried before the court without a jury. The findings of the trial court are not found in the record, but, as the correctness of such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Hogan v. Atlantic Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Youngberg v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Williams v. PomeroySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Conroy v. FerreeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Leitch v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Telford v. HenricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Dyer v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908