Conroy v. Ferree
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the garnishees and the intervenor Englund from a judgment of the district court for Stevens county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of O. L. Brown, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
The .plaintiff brought an action against defendant for the recovery of a debt, and commenced garnishment proceedings against the garnishees, Thompson and Brevig. In response to the garnishee summons, one of the garnishees appeared before the clerk of the court December 10, 1895, and disclosed that the garnishees were partners, and as such had employed the defendant for some time prior to the day the garnishee summons was served, and on that day there was due and owing from them, for his wages, the sum of $175; but that prior to the service of the garnishee summons they had accepted an order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. BarclaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Alger v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- First National Bank v. LightnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Baylor v. ButterfassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Liberty State Bank v. Metropolitan Church Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- King v. Carroll-Porter Boiler & Tank Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.