Williams v. Pomeroy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the1 municipal court of Minneapolis, denying a motion for judgment against the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co., garnishee of C. B. Russell, and ordering the discharge of the garnishee, on the ground that, prior to the service of the garnishee summons, the debt garnished had been assigned to Pomeroy, the claimant.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
In an action against C. B. Russell, this plaintiff garnished the railroad company, and on the disclosure it appeared that the company owed for one month’s services of defendant, and enough was disclosed to suggest, though not to prove, that the debt had been assigned to Pom*86eroy, whereupon the court denied a motion of plaintiff for judgment, and then, on plaintiff’s motion, adjourned the future hearing to give an opportunity to plaintiff to give Pomeroy notice to appear and be joined as a party. At the adjourned day Pomeroy appeared, set forth his claim to the debt by affidavit, and asked to…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
- Bellingham Bay Boom Co. v. BrisboisWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Lewis v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Purcell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Mansfield v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.