Leitch v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $45.75 unpaid wages earned by one Ayers while in the employ of defendant, which plaintiff alleged had been assigned to him. The case was tried before Hiñe, J., who found in favor of plaintiff. From a judgnjent entered pursuant to the order, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of the city of St, Paul. There is no dispute as to the facts upon which judgment is based. They are substantially these:
On February 4, 1903, O. G. Ayers, who was then in the employment of the defendant, hereafter referred to as the “debtor,” borrow*36ed of the plaintiff $40, and gave his promissory note therefor to the plaintiff, and at the same time executed to the plaintiff a writing, the here material provisions of which are as follows, namely:
For a valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ludlum v. RothschildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Hogan v. Atlantic Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. MaginnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Evans v. StaalleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- O'Connor v. MeehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Seaboard Small Loan Corporation v. OttingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Citizens Loan Ass'n v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Way v. BarneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- In re LineberryDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.