Dyer v. Schneider
Supreme Court of Minnesota
In. an action in justice court Peter Scheuer was served with garnishee summons and the garnishee disclosed an indebtedness. At the time of disclosure the Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company, as claimant under a chattel mortgage, was made a party to the proceeding and issue was joined between plaintiffs and claimant. The defendant defaulted and' the justice rendered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against the claimant.
Read the full summary
In. an action in justice court Peter Scheuer was served with garnishee summons and the garnishee disclosed an indebtedness. At the time of disclosure the Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company, as claimant under a chattel mortgage, was made a party to the proceeding and issue was joined between plaintiffs and claimant. The defendant defaulted and' the justice rendered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against the claimant. From the judgment, claimant appealed on questions of law and fact to the district court for Stearns county, where the appeal was tried on an agreed statement of facts…
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Appeal by claimant from a judgment of the district court of the county of Stearns in favor of the plaintiffs, and against the garnishee, for the amount of their claim against the defendant, with costs and disbursements against the claimant.
The admitted facts upon which the judgment is based are to the effect following: The plaintiffs duly recovered judgment against the defendant and duly instituted garnishee proceedings, and at the time of the service of the garnishee summons there were funds in the hands of the garnishee, amounting to $95, which represented moneys earned by the defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leitch v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Sykes v. HannawaltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Sandwich Manufacturing Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Lehigh V. R. v. WoodringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Steinbach v. BrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- International Harvester Co. of America v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917