Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1997No. Criminal 960025; Civil 960176PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Foster appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial and the denial of his application for post conviction relief. We affirm the trial court’s denial of application for post-conviction relief and dismiss the appeal from the order denying a new trial. FACTS

[¶ 2] On September 1,1994, while incarcerated at the North Dakota State Penitentiary for an unrelated charge, Mark Foster signed an “Inmate’s Notice of Detainer, Untried Indictment, Information, or Complaint” (the detainer) pursuant to the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (the Detain-ers Act),…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. City of Bismarck v. NassifNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Falcon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API