Legal Opinion

State v. DuPaul

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1995No. Cr. 940137, 940138PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Michael O. DuPaul appeals from the denial of his motions for appointment of counsel for this appeal and for an extension of time to appeal his jury convictions. We affirm both denials and dismiss DuPaul’s untimely appeals from the jury convictions.

This is another episode in DuPaul’s quixotic quest for his personalized conception of justice. In 1991, DuPaul was arrested for drunk driving and preventing official duties, and his driver’s license was revoked. Du- Paul appealed the revocation, and • we affirmed. North Dakota Dep’t of Transp. v. DuPaul, 487 N.W.2d 593 (N.D.1992).…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. HarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. ChamleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Filler v. BraggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HilgersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API