Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. George v. Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1935No. 25851. Department OnePublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteixert, J.

This is a mandamus action to compel the reinstatement of a civil service employee to the position formerly held by him and, further, to compel the issuance to him of salary warrants covering the period of his enforced lay-off. Upon a trial to the court, a decree granting the relief prayed for was entered. The defendants have appealed.

The question before us involves, primarily, the right of priority between two civil service employees claiming the same position, namely, that of lineman. The facts are not in dispute.

The government of the city of Seattle is divided into fourteen departments,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Detamore v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Tsutakawa v. KumamotoWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Murray v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State ex rel. Cowles v. SchivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lane v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Carkonen v. AlbertsWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Longview Co. v. LynnWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Goodwin v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Hearty v. MullinWashington Supreme Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API