Legal Opinion

Carkonen v. Alberts

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1938No. 27115. Department TwoPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

— Plaintiff verbally employed J. F. Al-berts, one of the copartners operating as real estate brokers under the firm name Alberts-Gingrich, to negotiate, on behalf of plaintiff, the purchase of certain real property in King county. Alberts purchased that property with his own money and subsequently sold same at a profit. This action was instituted to establish a trust for the plaintiff in the proceeds from the sale of the property. The appeal is from the judgment of dismissal rendered upon plaintiff’s refusal to plead further, after a demurrer had been sustained to the complaint on the ground…

2Cases cited117 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Wood v. . RabeNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lane v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Omer v. OmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Greenly v. GreenlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API