Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Clausen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1911No. 9363PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Mitchell, J., entered November 2, 1910, in favor of the defendants, affirming an order of the state board of equalization in fixing the value of relator’s properties for the purpose of taxation.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

The railroad commission law was passed by the legislature at its regular biennial session in 1905. Its primary object was to prevent discrimination and extortion in freight rates, and generally to regulate charges, facilities, and service of railroad companies. Section 12 of the Laws of 1905, page 155, enjoined a duty of ascertaining “the amount of money expended in the construction and equipment per mile of every railway in Washington.” At the same session the legislature passed an act creating a state tax commission (Laws 1905, p. 224, chap. 115; Rem. & Bal. Code, § 9084 et seq.), and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bee Building Co. v. SavageNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Doty Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Lewis CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Anderson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. BAINBRIDGE POLICE GUILD v. City of PuyallupWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Bainbridge Island Police Guild v. City of PuyallupWashington Supreme Court · 2011

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API