Legal Opinion

State v. Knoll

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 2007No. A06-1245PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

In this appeal from conviction of motor-vehicle theft and fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance, Michael Knoll argues that the Clay County District Court improperly denied his evidence-suppression motion and failed to obtain a sufficient waiver of his rights before the case was submitted to the court under the procedure provided in State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854 (Minn.1980). Because Knoll did not waive the rights described in Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 3 (2005), Knoll’s waiver was incomplete, and we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Michael Knoll was arrested…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State v. VerscheldeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. SandmoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. HalsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KuhlmannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State v. AntrimCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. FlukerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. State v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API