State v. Kuhlmann
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
In this appeal from conviction of felony domestic assault and second-degree driv ing while impaired, Brent Kuhlmann argues that because his stipulation to jury instructions without the conviction-based elements of the offenses did not include his personal, informed waiver of a jury trial on these elements, a new trial is required. Because there was no objection to the district court’s jury instructions at trial, we review the challenge on appeal under a plain-error standard. Applying the plain-error standard, we conclude that the fairness and integrity of judicial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State of Minnesota v. Christian Portillo, A21-1621, Supreme Court, December 13, 2023Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Christian Portillo, A21-1621, Supreme Court, December 13, 2023Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Christian Portillo, A21-1621, Supreme Court, December 13, 2023Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.