State v. Fluker
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction for failure to register as a predatory offender, arguing that the district court’s failure to obtain his personal waiver of his right to a jury trial on two stipulated elements of the offense requires automatic reversal. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Calhoun Fluker, III, was required to register with law enforcement as a predatory offender. In September 2006, appellant notified the Minnesota Department of Public Safety of his current primary address. Following a May 2007 investigation, the Ramsey County Sheriffs Department determined that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Timothy G. McGurk v. Donald Stenberg, Attorney General for the State of Nebraska Michael Thurber, Superintendent of the Lancaster County JailCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State of Minnesota v. John Everette PierceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015