Legal Opinion

State v. Fluker

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 2010No. A09-191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction for failure to register as a predatory offender, arguing that the district court’s failure to obtain his personal waiver of his right to a jury trial on two stipulated elements of the offense requires automatic reversal. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Calhoun Fluker, III, was required to register with law enforcement as a predatory offender. In September 2006, appellant notified the Minnesota Department of Public Safety of his current primary address. Following a May 2007 investigation, the Ramsey County Sheriffs Department determined that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Timothy G. McGurk v. Donald Stenberg, Attorney General for the State of Nebraska Michael Thurber, Superintendent of the Lancaster County JailCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. State of Minnesota v. John Everette PierceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API