Legal Opinion

State v. Ehmke

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 2008No. A07-0824PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant Kevin Dwaine Ehmke, formerly known as Kevin Dwaine Sandahl, 1 challenges his conviction of failure to register as a predatory offender on the grounds that (1) the matter was improperly venued in Otter Tail County; (2) his conviction violated the constitutional protection against double jeopardy; and (3) he was tried on stipulated facts pursuant to State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854 (Minn.1980) without a valid waiver. Because the district court did not err in determining that the prohibition against double jeopardy was not violated and that the matter was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. LeroySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AntrimCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. State v. Castillo-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. FlukerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State of Minnesota v. John Everette PierceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State of Tennessee v. Jim George Conaser a.k.a. Jimmy George ConaserCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API