Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Second National Bank of New Haven

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 5, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

The facts in this case are substantially similar to those in Baydrop v. Second National Bank, 120 Conn. 322, 180 Atl. 469. The plaintiffs were note-holders under a mortgage given to The Parker-Smith Company, as trustee, and brought this suit against the defendant in possession of the property by judgment of strict foreclosure as successor trustee, asking that the defendant be required to account, to give a list of the names and addresses of the noteholders under the mortgage, to return to the plaintiffs all moneys collected as commission and retained by it not in accordance with the terms of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tyler v. AspinwallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  2. Ideal Financing Association v. LabonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Baydrop v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Hoffman v. First Bond Mortgage Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Richardson v. MonsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Security First National Bank v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Delfino v. VealencisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Fernandes v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Borzencki v. Estate of StakumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Struzinski v. StruzinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API