Legal Opinion
Borzencki v. Estate of Stakum
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1985No. 11808PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The main issue in this appeal is whether the Superior Court properly ordered a par*369tition by sale of certain real estate located in Oxford in which the parties1 owned varying fractional interests in their own rights and through the testate estate of Anthony J. Stakum (testator).
The testator, a widower, died on April 11, 1980, a resident of Oxford. His last will and testament was admitted to probate in the Probate Court for the district of Oxford. The residuary clause of the will devised to certain parties interests in three contiguous parcels of land in Oxford comprising in total approximately…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fuessenich v. DiNardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Prince v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Johnson v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Delfino v. VealencisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- MacHiz v. Homer Harmon, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.