Parker v. Swett
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Samuel C. Wiel, William E. Colby, Percy S. King and Clarence N. Riggins for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants following an order of nonsuit. The action was to quiet title in the plaintiff to certain easements upon the lands of defendants alleged to be appurtenant to the land of plaintiff. Appellant contends that the nonsuit was improperly granted.
The facts of the case are briefly these: In 1890, W. W. Thompson and Horace B. Chase were the owners in common of certain lands in Napa County. On May 7th of that year, this land was partitioned between them. Thompson received by the partition deed the southern half of the original tract and Chase received the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Ballard v. TitusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Barlow v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Los Angeles v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Quinn v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Ocean Shore Railroad Co. v. DoelgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Northwest Pipeline Corp. v. Forrest Weaver Farm, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.