Barlow v. Frink
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wright & Winnek, and Goodfellow, Eells, Moore & Orrick, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
A rehearing was granted in this case after a decision rendered in department of this court. Upon further consideration we are satisfied that except as to one matter discussed in the department opinion which we think was not involved in the appeal and should be eliminated therefrom, all the points which really were involved in such appeal were correctly decided by the department opinion. With this matter eliminated but to be referred to subsequently, said opinion in department prepared by Mr. Justice Melvin is as follows, and is adopted as the opinion of this court in Bank:
“Plaintiff sued for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Tarpey v. VeithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Dennis v. Crocker-Huffman Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Lynch v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.