Legal Opinion

Roman Ramirez-Memije v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 5, 2013No. 14-11-00456-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARON McCALLY, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant Roman Ramirez-Memije of fraudulent possession of 10 or more but less than 50 items of identifying information, a second-degree felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.51(b), (c)(3) (West Supp.2012). Appellant challenges his conviction in three issues, arguing that the trial court erred by (1) refusing to include in the jury charge appellant’s requested instruction on voluntary conduct under Section 6.01 of the Penal Code; (2) failing to include in the jury charge an instruction concerning presumptions under Section 2.05 of the Penal…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Poindexter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Adanandus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ramirez-Memije v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Damien Hernandez Cortez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  3. Roman Ramirez-Memije v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Ramirez-Memije, RomanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API