Legal Opinion

Adanandus v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1993No. 70897PublishedCited by 446 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MALONEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the course of committing a robbery. TexPenal Code Ann. § 19.03(a)(2). The jury affirmatively answered the special issues submitted. Tex.Code CRIm.PROC.Ann. art. 37.071(b). Appeal to this court is automatic. Tex.Code CrimProcAnn. art. 37.071(h).

In point of error forty appellant claims “the trial court erred in denying [his] motion for acquittal based on insufficient evidence to prove the death of the victim was intentional.” A discussion of the facts is necessary in order to address this and the other points of error alleging…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by446 opinions

  1. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Chamberlain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

441 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API