Roman Ramirez-Memije v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
Sharon McCally, Justice
A jury convicted appellant Roman Ramirez-Memije of fraudulent possession of ten or more but less than fifty items of identifying information, a second-degree felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.51(b), (c)(3). We hold that appellant suffered egregious harm from the inclusion of an unconstitutional mandatory presumption in the jury charge. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand for a new trial.
I. Background
The State presented evidence that appellant was a middleman in a credit card skimming operation. Appellant obtained a credit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Tottenham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Webber v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grimm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Alejandro Caballero v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021
- Louis Dwayne Felkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
- Tonia Elizabeth Ross v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
- Tonieka Renea McIlvennia, AKA Tonieka Reanea McIlvenna, AKA Tonieka Renea Burnside, AKA Tonieka James v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016