Legal Opinion

George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.

Property in plaintiff’s restaurant at Eighth avenue and Thirty-sixth street, borough of Manhattan, was damaged on April 10, 1938, by water which flowed into the premises from a broken main laid and maintained by defendant in the roadway of *968Eighth avenue about four feet below the surface. In this action to recover compensation therefor, an effort was made to show that defendant was negligent in not shutting off the water with reasonable diligence after notice of the break, but that effort was unsuccessful. Plaintiff’s evidence thus showed no basis of liability on the part of defendant unless…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Hogan v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Goldstein v. . Pullman Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Marceau v. Rutland Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Bush Terminal Company v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co. v. Washington Water PowerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Romero v. Truchas Mutual Domestic Water Consumer & Mutual Sewage Works Ass'nNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API