Legal Opinion

Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1957No. 22569PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Adam Hat Stores, Inc., plaintiff-respondent herein, sued the City of Kansas City for property damage to certain of its merchandise in the sum of $3,812.49 resulting from a break in the City’s water main located in the public street in front of plaintiff’s store where the merchandise was kept. The cause was submitted to the jury under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, and the jury returned its verdict for defendant. Thereafter, the trial court granted a new trial because of its alleged error in denying plaintiff’s counsel the right to comment on the failure of defendant to call as…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Belding v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. Block v. RackersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Graeff Ex Rel. Graeff v. Baptist Temple of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. BolesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Lubin v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Arlene Delores Staples, a Minor, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API