Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Fitch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1913No. 2395PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Comanche County; I. T. Johnson, Judge. Action between Uriah Murphy and G. F. Fitch. From the judgment, Uriah Murphy brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWieliams, J.

Plaintiff, in his petition, alleged as follows :

“That he is now and was at all times hereinafter set out and ever since * * * the owner in fee simple and in the lawful possession of lots 7 and 8, in block 46, in the town of Temple, Comanche county, state of Oklahoma, together with "the appurtenances thereunto belonging, and the defendant herein, on the 14th day of January, 1911, unlawfully entered upon said premises of this said plaintiff and with gun in hand then and there threatened and attempted to shoot and kill said-plaintiff, and then and there threatened to take possession of said lots…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Corning v. . Troy Iron and Nail FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Black v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Wheelock v. . NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Deskins v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Ball v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Burnett v. Sapulpa Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Midland Valley R. Co. v. ImlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API