Burnett v. Sapulpa Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by the Sapulpa Refining Company ■against Brooks G. Burnett. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant 'brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
The parties will be designated as in the trial court: This is an action for an injunction, which was begun by the filing of the following petition, duly sworn to:
“Comes now the plaintiff and for its cause of action against the defendant, alleges and states:
“That the plaintiff: is* a corporation, organized under the.laws of the state "of Oklahoma, and is engaged in the manufacturing business, to wit: The refining business near the city of Sapulpa, Greek county, Okla. That the plaintiff: is now and has been for more than three years last past in lawful, peaceable and actual…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Hughes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Marshall v. HomierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Glasco v. School Dist. No. 22, McClain CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McPherson v. First Presbyterian Church of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Deskins v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GillamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.