Farmers' Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. McCall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Poiicuwatomie Gouniy Court; E. B. Beasor; Judge. Action bj the Farmers’ National Bank of Tecumseh against J. W. McCall. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Citing: Howry v. Eppinger, 34 Micb. 29; Fancourt v. Thorne, 9 Q. B. 312; First Nat. Bank v. Mining Go. (Colo. App.) 68 Pac. 981; Kiskadden v. Allen, 7 Colo. 206; Chicago, etc., Go. v. Merchants’ Bank, 136 U. S. 268; Dobbins v. Oberman, 17 Neb. 163 ; Ernst v. Steckman, 74 Pa.
Read the full summary
Error from Poiicuwatomie Gouniy Court; E. B. Beasor; Judge. Action bj the Farmers’ National Bank of Tecumseh against J. W. McCall. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Citing: Howry v. Eppinger, 34 Micb. 29; Fancourt v. Thorne, 9 Q. B. 312; First Nat. Bank v. Mining Go. (Colo. App.) 68 Pac. 981; Kiskadden v. Allen, 7 Colo. 206; Chicago, etc., Go. v. Merchants’ Bank, 136 U. S. 268; Dobbins v. Oberman, 17 Neb. 163 ; Ernst v. Steckman, 74 Pa. St. 13; Wilson v. Campbell, 110 Micb. 580; First Nat. Bank v. Flaih (N. D.) 86 N. W. 867; Hamilton v. Fowler, 99 Fed. 18; Frost v. Fisher…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The following questions are raised by this record:(1) Was the note of December 19, 1905, which is claimed to have been secured by the mortgage on the wagon and two mules, negotiable in character and entitled to all the privileges and exemptions of negotiable paper?(2) Was there such an alteration as rendered the same void?(3) Was said note of December 19th executed in lieu of the one of November 8th, and intended to be secured by the mortgage executed to secure the payment of the said note of November 8th?(4) The plaintiff in error holding said note of December 19th as collateral seeuritjr…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Ex Parte HudsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Westlake v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Wiley v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Manska v. San Benito Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.