Legal Opinion

Sjostrom v. Sproule

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1965No. 38794PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

The plaintiff, Robert Sjostrom, was injured when the car in which he was riding, driven by the defendant John Sproule, collided with another car. Both parties were employees of Armour & Co., an employer covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and they were going to work when the accident occurred. Section 5 of the Illinois Workment’s Compensation Act bars an action by an employee against the employer or his employees “for injury or death sustained by any employee while engaged in the line of his duty as such employee.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1963, chap. 48, par. 138.5.) The question before us is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Zerulla v. Supreme Lodge Order of Mutual ProtectionIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. United Disposal & Recovery Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Christian v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Meerbrey v. Marshall Field & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Collier v. Wagner Castings Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Vendo Company v. StonerIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Fregeau v. GillespieIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Jablonski v. MultackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API